Whether you are studying remotely or teaching in person, enrolled in a class or simply perusing the latest book releases, fall is a quintessential time for learning. Few pedagogues have matched the influence of two-time Pulitzer winner Richard Hofstadter. With a laissez-faire teaching style that influenced students including historian Stanley Elkins and New York City specialist Mike Wallace (a recipient of the 1999 History Prize), the Columbia-based Hofstadter was a vanguard force in the turn toward a pragmatic, intersectional approach "in which conflicts of interests have been fought out, compromised, adjusted." While he embraced elements of neoconservatism before his premature death from leukemia aged 54 in 1970, Hofstadter retained Old Left circumspection toward the nation's business, religious and national security establishments, an ethos that suffused his second Pulitzer-winning book, "Anti-Intellectualism in American Life." Envisioned as a rejoinder to the "egghead" canard that saw Adlai Stevenson lose two presidential elections to Dwight Eisenhower in the '50s, "Anti-Intellectualism" welds a circuitous history of American "primitivism" (with an emphasis on the foundational influence of the emergence of Anglo-American evangelicalism in the mid-18th century) to editorializing on what he perceived to be the contemporaneous decline of intellectualism, from the influence of "hundred percenter" business interests to the RAND Corporation's "expert" national security servitors and the "adolescent rebellion" of the Beats. "[Political intelligence] accepts conflict as a central and enduring reality and understands human society as a form of equipoise based upon the continuing process of compromise," he writes. "It shuns ultimate showdowns and looks upon the ideal of total partisan victory as unattainable, as merely another variety of threat to the kind of balance with which it is familiar. It is sensitive to nuances and sees things in degrees. It is essentially relativist and skeptical, but at the same time circumspect and humane." While one may concur or take umbrage at Hofstadter's thesis, his sense of purpose makes for compelling reading more than 60 years after Stevenson's defeat in the autumn of 1956.