How Does the Public Define “History”?
American Historical Association Surveys Public Perceptions of History:
A new National Endowment for the Humanities-funded survey ("History, the Past, and Public Culture: Results from a National Survey") conducted by the American Historical Association in conjunction with Fairleigh Dickinson University more than twenty years after the groundbreaking "Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life" (1998) "[aspires] to take America's historical pulse by assessing public perceptions of, and engagement with, the discipline of history and the past" in an effort to "help cultural organizations, K–12 and higher education institutions, state humanities councils, journalists, policymakers, and others better understand their audiences and broaden the relevance of historical work to public culture." According to the survey, most laypeople primarily view history as "an assembly of names, dates, and other facts about what happened in the past" vis-à-vis the increasing "gulf between practicing historians and the audiences the former serve," as exemplified by the former's reliance on explication of past events through descriptive questioning and analysis in addition to the multifaceted prism of causes and effects. "Political party identification likewise correlated with chosen definitions of history," the report continued. "A majority of respondents, whether self-identifying as Democrat, Republican, independent, or no preference, perceived history as defined by facts. That said, whereas Democrats, independents, and those with no preference all fell within a fairly narrow band of 58 percent to 63 percent agreement on this issue, Republicans skewed much more heavily (81 percent) toward a history-as-facts position." In its final section, the authors explored the putative link between historical interest and civics. "Those of us working in history fields want the public to be more informed about the past, and to use that knowledge responsibly for the betterment of society," they wrote. "In that vein, we hope that such knowledge translates to greater civic engagement, history-related or otherwise. Does such a link exist? Drawing such causal connections is inherently difficult, but our data lead us to believe that advanced education and some forms of interest in the past are conducive to increasing people's civic involvement."